COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATED METHODS FOR MODELING METAL STRUCTURES USING AUTOCAD 3D AND TEKLA STRUCTURES

Abstract

Modeling, design, calculation, result, analysis, automation, construction.

The article discusses the features of three-dimensional modeling in AutoCAD 3D and Tekla Structures automated design systems, which are widely used in modern engineering and construction design. The purpose of the study is to compare the functional capabilities of these software packages, identify their main advantages, disadvantages, and areas of effective practical use. The paper analyzes the history of software development, the principles of modeling organization, and the tools for creating spatial models.

Particular attention is paid to the features of using three-dimensional modeling in AutoCAD, which has long remained a universal tool for creating drawings and geometric models in various fields of engineering. The possibilities of building solid and surface models, the flexibility of editing tools, and the versatility of the software environment are analyzed. At the same time, certain limitations of the program when performing specialized construction design tasks are noted.

The article also explores the functionality of Tekla Structures as a modern BIM system focused on detailed modeling of building structures. The principle of working with parametric elements, the possibilities of creating an information model of a building, automated generation of working drawings, specifications, and material lists are considered. Particular attention is paid to the practical significance of the program in the design of metal structures.

Based on the analysis, key differences between the approaches to three-dimensional modeling in these software packages have been identified. It has been shown that AutoCAD is suitable for universal graphic design and creation of basic 3D models, while Tekla Structures is an effective tool for detailed development of structural solutions and implementation of building information modeling technology. The results obtained may be useful for students of technical specialties, design engineers, and construction industry professionals when choosing software for performing professional tasks.

1. Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., Liston K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. — Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

2. Azhar S. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry // Leadership and Management in Engineering. — 2011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127

3. Succar B. Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders // Automation in Construction. — 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003

4. ДБН В.2.6-198:2014 Сталеві конструкції. Норми проектування. Зі Зміною № 1. [Чинний від 10.06.2014]. Вид. офіц. Київ: Мінрегіонбуд України, 2014. 298 с.

DBN V.2.6-198:2014 Stalevi konstruktsii. Normy proektuvannia. Zi Zminoiu № 1. [Chynnyi vid 10.06.2014]. Vyd. ofits. Kyiv: Minrehionbud Ukrainy, 2014. 298 s.

5. ДСТУ 9243.7:2023 Система проєктної документації для будівництва. Правила виконання архітектруно-будівельних робочих креслень. [Чинний від 03.07.2023]. Вид. офіц. Київ: Мінрегіонбуд України, 2023. 45 с.

DSTU 9243.7:2023 Systema proiektnoi dokumentatsii dlia budivnytstva. Pravyla vykonannia arkhitektruno-budivelnykh robochykh kreslen. [Chynnyi vid 03.07.2023]. Vyd. ofits. Kyiv: Minrehionbud Ukrainy, 2023. 45 s