INFLUENCE OF REPEATED LOADS ON DEFLECTIONS OF LINKS OF DOUBLE-HINGED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES WITH ARTIFICIAL REGULATION OF FORCES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31713/budres.v0i49.21

Abstract

Reinforced concrete, concrete, reinforcement, frame, force, deflection, calculation, deformation, stress

The aim is to analyze the effect of repeated low-cycle loading on deflections in two-hinged reinforced concrete frames with artificial force regulation with similar two-hinged reinforced concrete frames without artificial force regulation. To study U-shaped reinforced concrete frames with artificial force regulation, reinforced concrete frame samples were manufactured, which had the following dimensions in the axes: span l = 2000 mm, height h = 1100 mm, cross-section of the frame beam – 160 × 100 mm, cross-section of the frame column 180 × 100 mm.

The frame crossbar and uprights are reinforced with spatial frames with four symmetrically arranged Ø14A400C rods. The upper rods in the crossbar nodes are rounded and inserted into the uprights beyond the lower edge of the crossbar by 200 mm (twenty diameters). The transverse reinforcement in the uprights and crossbars is made in the form of closed welded frames of Ø5Vr-I rods installed in the crossbar with a pitch of 60, and in the upright 70 and 50 mm in the near-wall zone. The prestressed tightening of the frame is made of Ø18 A400C rod reinforcement. The frame tests were performed according to the scheme of a two-hinged system, loading the crossbar with two concentrated forces at a distance of 75 cm from the axis of the uprights. The forces were created by a hydraulic jack, and the force was measured by a calibrated ring dynamometer.

The results of the analysis of the influence of repeated loads on the deflections of the frame crossbar with artificial force regulation are presented. It was established that at loading levels Fcyc ≈ 0.3 Fu – 0.45 Fu, the stabilization of the deflections of the frame crossbar with artificial force regulation occurs by the fifth load-unload cycle. At loading levels Fcyc ≈ 0.3 Fu – 0.7 Fu, the stabilization of the frame deflections occurs by the sixth load-unload cycle. An increase in the load level (from 0.45 Fu to 0.7 Fu), after stabilization of the frame with artificial force regulation, leads to an increase in deflections. Re-stabilization of frame beam deflections with artificial force regulation occurs during the next five load-unload cycles after increasing its level. Stabilization of deflections occurs immediately after reducing the load level in the frames.

1. Філіпчук С. В. Робота замкнутих залізобетонних рам при повторних малоциклових навантаженнях: дис. к-та наук. Полтава, 2009. 287 с.

Filipchuk S. V. Robota zamknutykh zalizobetonnykh ram pry povtornykh malotsyklovykh navantazhenniakh: dys.  k-ta nauk. Poltava, 2009. 287 s.

2. ДБН В.2.6–98:2009. Конструкції будинків і споруд. Бетонні та залізобетонні конструкції. Основні положення. – К.:Мінрегіонбуд України, 2011. – 71 с.

DBN V.2.6–98:2009. Konstruktsii budynkiv i sporud. Betonni ta zalizobetonni konstruktsii. Osnovni polozhennia. – K.:Minrehionbud Ukrainy, 2011. – 71 s.

3. Бабич В.Є., Ковальчук Ю.Т. Напружено-деформований стан залізобетонних П-подібних рам, розрахованих за пружньою стадією роботи та стадією з урахуванням перерозподілу зусиль. Ресурсоекономні матеріали, конструкції, будівлі та споруди, Рівне: Видавництво НУВГП, 2023. Випуск 44, С. 120-132. https://doi.org/10.31713/budres.v0i44.14

Babych V.Ie., Kovalchuk Yu.T. Napruzheno-deformovanyi stan zalizobetonnykh P-podibnykh ram, rozrakhovanykh za pruzhnoiu stadiieiu roboty ta stadiieiu z urakhuvanniam pererozpodilu zusyl. Resursoekonomni materialy, konstruktsii, budivli ta sporudy, Rivne: Vydavnytstvo NUVHP, 2023. Vypusk 44, S. 120-132.

4. Filipchuk S.V., Sobishchanskyi O.L., Kovalchuk Y.T. Methodology for testing double-hinged reinforced concrete frames with artificial regulation of forces. Resource-saving materials, structures, buildings and structures, Rivne, NUWM, 2025. Issue 47, pp. 425-430. https://doi.org/10.31713/budres.v0i47.51

5. Tunc G., Othman M., Mertol H. Finite Element Analysis of Frames with Reinforced Concrete Encased Steel Composite Columns // – 2022. – Vol. 12(3). – P. 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030375

6. Savin S., Iliushchenko T. Calculation of reinforced concrete frames with discrete crack modeling. Reinforced Concrete Structures. – 2024. – Vol. 1. – P. 45–54. https://doi.org/10.22227/2949-1622.2024.2.54-63

7. Karaton M., Sayin E. Failure analysis of reinforced concrete frames using finite element modeling . Engineering Structures. – 2014. – Vol. 74. – P. 87–97.

8. MacGregor J. G., Wight J. K. Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design. – 6th ed. – Upper Saddle River : Pearson Education, 2012. – 1152 p.

9. Фролов В. В. Сучасні тенденції проектування залізобетонних рам. // Вісник будівництва, №3, 2020.

Frolov V. V. Suchasni tendentsii proektuvannia zalizobetonnykh ram. // Visnyk budivnytstva, №3, 2020.

Published

2026-05-31

Issue

Section

Статті